Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children After Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion for Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Results From a Multidisciplinary Clinic.

BACKGROUND: We compared early neurodevelopmental morbidity in young children with severe CDH who underwent FETO to those without fetal therapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of severe CDH patients undergoing FETO (n = 18) at a single North American center from 2015 to 2021 (NCT02710968). Outpatient survivors (n = 12) were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and compared to expectantly managed CDH patients. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Capute Scales [Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scales (CLAMS) and Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT)], with a developmental quotient (DQ) < 85 indicative of at-risk for delay. RESULTS: At one year, 58% (n = 7) of FETO patients underwent evaluation, with notable concern for language delay (CLAMS median DQ, 80.1 [interquartile range, 67.6-86.7]). FETO scores improved by 24-months, whereas high severity/non-FETO scores declined [CLAMS median DQ (Difference in DQ), 92.3 (+12.2) vs. 77.1 (-13.4), respectively; p = 0.049]. On the initial CAT, FETO patients had concern for visual motor and problem-solving delays, with a median DQ of 81.3 (62.1-89.4). At 24-months, FETO patients had improving scores [Median CAT DQ, 90.8 (+9.5)], whereas high severity/non-FETO [87.5 (-3.0), p = 0.28] had declining scores. CONCLUSION: These initial data suggest that FETO is associated with favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24-months compared to severe CDH under expectant management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion for Severe, Left-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: The North American Fetal Therapy Network Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion Consortium Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in a multicenter North American cohort of patients with isolated, left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to compare neonatal mortality and morbidity in patients with severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with those expectantly managed. METHODS: We analyzed data from 10 centers in the NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network) FETO (Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion) Consortium registry, collected between November 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020. In addition to reporting procedure-related surgical outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion, we performed a comparative analysis of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion compared with contemporaneous expectantly managed patients. RESULTS: Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was successfully performed in 87 of 89 patients (97.8%). Six-month survival in patients with severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia did not differ significantly between patients who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and those managed expectantly (69.8% vs 58.1%, P =.30). Patients who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion had higher rates of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (54.0% vs 14.3%, P <.001), earlier gestational age at delivery (median 35.0 weeks vs 38.3 weeks, P <.001), and lower birth weights (mean 2,487 g vs 2,857 g, P =.001). On subanalysis, in patients for whom all recorded observed-to-expected lung/head ratio measurements were below 25%, patients with fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion required fewer days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (median 9.0 days vs 17.0 days, P =.014). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was successfully implemented across several North American fetal therapy centers. Although survival was similar among patients undergoing fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and those expectantly managed, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in North American centers may reduce morbidity, as suggested by fewer days of ECMO in those patients with persistently reduced lung volumes (observed-to-expected lung/head ratio below 25%).

Serial lung mass volume ratios as prognostic indicators of neonatal respiratory morbidity in fetal pulmonary malformations.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that the congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio is a useful prognosticator of neonatal outcome in prenatally diagnosed lung lesions. However, there remains a lack of consensus on which congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio values have the best predictive value because of operator dependence, inherent changes in lung lesion size throughout gestation, and the widespread use of maternal steroids. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the association between serial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements and neonatal outcomes among fetuses with lung malformations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of fetuses with a prenatally diagnosed lung malformation managed at 2 major fetal centers from January 2010 to December 2021. Prenatal variables, including prospectively measured congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements (initial, maximum, and final), were analyzed. The results were correlated with 3 outcome measures, namely surgical resection before 30 days of life, a need for supplemental O2 at birth, and endotracheal intubation at birth. Statistical analyses were performed using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, Welch 2 sample t tests, and multivariable logistic regressions (P<.05). RESULTS: There were 123 fetuses with isolated lung lesions identified. Eight (6.5%) had hydrops. The mean initial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 0.67±0.61 cm2 at 22.9±3.9 weeks' gestation. The mean maximum congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 1.08 ± 0.94 cm2 at 27.0 ± 4.0 weeks' gestation. The mean final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 0.58±0.60 cm2 at 33.2±4.1 weeks' gestation. At a mean gestational age at delivery of 38.3±2.6 weeks, 15 (12.2%) underwent neonatal lung resection for symptomatic disease. In a multivariable regression, all 3 congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements showed a significant correlation with neonatal lung resection (P<.001). Optimal congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio cutoffs were established based on an initial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥0.8 cm2, maximum congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥1.5 cm2, and a final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥1.3 cm2 with associated areas under the curve of 0.89, 0.97, and 0.93, respectively. The final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio had the highest specificity for predicting surgical lung resection in the early postnatal period. CONCLUSION: Measuring congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratios throughout pregnancy in fetuses with pulmonary malformations has clinical value for prenatal counseling and planning care transition after delivery. Fetuses with a final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of more than 1.3 cm2 are likely to require neonatal surgery and therefore should be delivered at tertiary care centers with a neonatal intensive care unit and pediatric surgical expertise.

Potential higher risk of tethered spinal cord in children after prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of secondary tethered spinal cord (TSC) between prenatal and postnatal closure in patients with MMC. The objectives was to understand the incidence of secondary TSC after prenatal surgery for MMC compared to postnatal surgery for MMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On May 4, 2023, a systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to gather relevant data. Primary studies focusing on repair type, lesion level, and TSC were included, while non-English or non-Dutch reports, case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, letters, comments, and animal studies were excluded. Two reviewers assessed the included studies for bias risk, following PRISMA guidelines. TSC frequency in MMC closure types was determined, and the relationship between TSC occurrence and closure technique was analyzed using relative risk and Fisher's exact test. Subgroup analysis revealed relative risk differences based on study designs and follow-up periods. A total of ten studies, involving 2,724 patients, were assessed. Among them, 2,293 patients underwent postnatal closure, while 431 received prenatal closure for the MMC defect. In the prenatal closure group, TSC occurred in 21.6% (n = 93), compared to 18.8% (n = 432) in the postnatal closure group. The relative risk (RR) of TSC in patients with prenatal MMC closure versus postnatal MMC closure was 1.145 (95%CI 0.939 to 1.398). Fisher's exact test indicated a statistically non-significant association (p = 0.106) between TSC and closure technique. When considering only RCT and controlled cohort studies, the overall RR for TSC was 1.308 (95%CI 1.007 to 1.698) with a non-significant association (p = .053). For studies focusing on children up until early puberty (maximum 12 years follow-up), the RR for tethering was 1.104 (95%CI 0.876 to 1.391), with a non-significant association (p = 0.409). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This review found no significant increase in relative risk of TSC between prenatal and postnatal closure in MMC patients, but a trend of increased TSC in the prenatal group. More long-term data on TSC after fetal closure is needed for better counseling and outcomes in MMC.

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and the Cardiovascular System: Causes, Consequences, Therapy, and Prevention.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy continue to be significant contributors to adverse perinatal outcome and maternal mortality, as well as inducing life-long cardiovascular health impacts that are proportional to the severity and frequency of pregnancy complications. The placenta is the interface between the mother and fetus and its failure to undergo vascular maturation in tandem with maternal cardiovascular adaptation by the end of the first trimester predisposes to hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction. While primary failure of trophoblastic invasion with incomplete maternal spiral artery remodeling has been considered central to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, cardiovascular risk factors associated with abnormal first trimester maternal blood pressure and cardiovascular adaptation produce identical placental pathology leading to hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Outside pregnancy blood pressure treatment thresholds are identified with the goal to prevent immediate risks from severe hypertension >160/100 mm Hg and long-term health impacts that arise from elevated blood pressures as low as 120/80 mm Hg. Until recently, the trend for less aggressive blood pressure management during pregnancy was driven by fear of inducing placental malperfusion without a clear clinical benefit. However, placental perfusion is not dependent on maternal perfusion pressure during the first trimester and risk-appropriate blood pressure normalization may provide the opportunity to protect from the placental maldevelopment that predisposes to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Recent randomized trials set the stage for more aggressive risk-appropriate blood pressure management that may offer a greater potential for prevention for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. KEY POINTS: · Optimal management of maternal blood pressure to prevent preeclampsia and its risks is undefined.. · Early gestational rheological damage to the intervillous space predisposes to preeclampsia and FGR.. · First trimester blood pressure management may need to aim for normotension to prevent preeclampsia..

Development of a simulator for training of fetoscopic myelomeningocele surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a realistic simulation model for laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic spina bifida aperta (SBa) surgery, to be used for training purposes and preoperative planning. METHODS: The predefined general requirement was a realistic model of an exteriorized uterus, allowing all neurosurgical steps of the intervention. The uterus was modelled using ultrasound and MRI images of a 25 weeks' gravid uterus, consisting of flexible polyurethane foam coated with pigmented silicone. The fetal model, contained an opening on the dorsal side for a customizable spinal insert with all the aspects of a SBa, including a cele, placode, and myofascial and skin layer. The model was assessed in a series of validation experiments. RESULTS: Production costs are low, uterus and fetus are reusable. Placental localization and the level and size of the spinal defect are adjustable, enabling case-specific adaptations. All aspects of the simulator were scored close to realistic or higher for both appearance and functional capacities. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative model provides an excellent training opportunity for centers that are starting a fetoscopic SBa repair program. It is the first simulation model with adjustable spinal defect and placental localisation. Further objective validation is required, but the potential for using this model in preoperative planning is promising.

Morbidity in children after fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Results from a multidisciplinary clinic.

BACKGROUND: Although fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) was recently shown to improve survival in a multicenter, randomized trial of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), morbidity outcomes remain essentially unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes in children with severe CDH who underwent FETO. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of severe CDH patients undergoing FETO at an experienced North American center from 2015-2021 (NCT02710968). This group was compared to a cohort of non-FETO CDH patients with severe disease as defined by liver herniation, large defect size, and/or ECMO use. Clinical data were collected through a multidisciplinary CDH clinic. Statistics were performed with t-tests and Chi-squared analyses (p≤0.05). RESULTS: There were 18 FETO and 17 non-FETO patients. ECMO utilization was 56% in the FETO cohort. Despite significantly lower median observed/expected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR) in the FETO group, [FETO: 23% (IQR:18-25) vs. non-FETO: 36% (IQR: 28-41), p<0.001], there were comparable survival rates at discharge (FETO: 78% vs. non-FETO: 59%, p = 0.23) and at 5-years (FETO: 67% vs. non-FETO: 59%, p = 0.53) between the two cohorts. At a median follow up of 5.8 years, metrics of pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary morbidity, and gastroesophageal reflux disease improved among patients after FETO. However, most FETO patients remained on bronchodilators/inhaled corticosteroids (58%) and were feeding tube dependent (67%). CONCLUSIONS: These North American data show that prenatal tracheal occlusion, in conjunction with a long-term multidisciplinary CDH clinic, is associated with acceptable long-term survival and morbidity in children after FETO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Improvement of Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Analysis with Implementation of Clot Catchers.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood gas testing is a key component of objective pre- and perinatal evaluation of fetal acid base status to determine presence of intrapartum asphyxia and risk of neonatal encephalopathy. Heparinized cord blood is more likely to form small clots than other blood sources, which can interfere with, or preclude, sample analysis. Cord blood samples are irreplaceable and cannot be recollected, thereby compromising clinical decision-making when analysis is not possible. We evaluated processes to prevent excessive rates of cord blood clotting and quantified their impact on successful testing of blood gas specimens. METHODS: Verified result and cancellation data were obtained retrospectively from the laboratory information system. Clot catchers were evaluated using noncord remnant specimens. Collection syringes were compared via collection from remnant cord sections. RESULTS: Prior to implementation of any interventions, retrospective analysis indicated a cancellation rate of 18.6% for umbilical cord blood gas specimens (arterial and venous) and 0.7% for noncord blood arterial and venous samples. Clot catchers were validated for clinical use, with a bias of <±4% for all analytes. After clot catchers were implemented for all cord specimens, cancellation rate decreased approximately 5-fold in the first month and remained <5% a year after implementation. A limited comparison of two heparin syringe types revealed a small difference in the overall rate of specimen clotting. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of clot catchers was acceptable for analysis of cord blood samples, and when implemented resulted in a sustained 5-fold decrease in the rate of cord blood gas order cancellation.

Postnatal care setting and survival after fetoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) was recently shown to improve postnatal survival in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of infants with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). However, the external validity of this study remains unclear given a lack of standardization in postnatal management approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an integrated prenatal and postnatal care setting on survival outcomes in severe CDH after FETO. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and individual participant analysis of FETO outcomes in severe CDH were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Subgroup analyses of patients managed in integrated versus nonintegrated settings were performed to identify predictors of outcome. RESULTS: The review generated five studies (n = 192) for the meta-analysis of FETO versus expectant prenatal management. These data revealed a significant survival benefit after FETO that was restricted to an integrated setting (OR 2.97, 95% Confidence Interval 1.69-4.26). There were nine studies (n = 150) for the individual participant analysis, which showed that FETO managed in an integrated setting had significantly increased survival rates when compared to FETO treated in a nonintegrated setting (70.7% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.003). Multi-level logistic regression identified increased availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the strongest determinant of postnatal survival (OR=18.8, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows that institutional integration of prenatal and postnatal care is associated with the highest overall survival in children with severe CDH. These data highlight the importance of a standardized, multidisciplinary approach, including access to ECMO, as a critical postnatal component in optimizing FETO outcomes in CDH.

Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers.

Fetal therapies undertaken to improve fetal outcome or to optimize transition to neonate life often entail some level of maternal, fetal, or neonatal risk. A fetal therapy center needs access to resources to carry out such therapies and to manage maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications that might arise, either related to the therapy per se or as part of the underlying fetal or maternal condition. Accordingly, a fetal therapy center requires a dedicated operational infrastructure and necessary resources to allow for appropriate oversight and monitoring of clinical performance and to facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration between the relevant specialties. Three care levels for fetal therapy centers are proposed to match the anticipated care complexity, with appropriate resources to achieve an optimal outcome at an institutional and regional level. A level I fetal therapy center should be capable of offering fetal interventions that may be associated with obstetric risks of preterm birth or membrane rupture but that would be very unlikely to require maternal medical subspecialty or intensive care, with neonatal risks not exceeding those of moderate prematurity. A level II center should have the incremental capacity to provide maternal intensive care and to manage extreme neonatal prematurity. A level III therapy center should offer the full range of fetal interventions (including open fetal surgery) and be able manage any of the associated maternal complications and comorbidities, as well as have access to neonatal and pediatric surgical intervention including indicated surgery for neonates with congenital anomalies.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of twin anemia polycythemia sequence in monochorionic multiple gestations.

Twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) is a consequence of unequal sharing of red blood cells between monochorionic twins resulting in anemia in the donor and polycythemia in the recipient twin. Prenatally TAPS can occur spontaneously or complicate incomplete laser surgery for twin transfusion syndrome. While there may be clinical overlap with twin transfusion syndrome or selective fetal growth restriction, diagnosis relies on Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocities. Significantly discordant velocities are diagnostic, while severity staging is based on signs of cardiovascular compromise. Conservative management, fetoscopic laser coagulation, selective twin reduction, fetal blood and exchange transfusion, and delivery may be selected guided by the gestational age of diagnosis, the severity of the condition, the likelihood of success, and the patients' priorities. Prenatal curative treatment that minimizes the risk for prematurity and residual morbidity at birth is most likely to offer the greatest short-term and long-term benefits.

Implementation Process and Evolution of a Laparotomy-Assisted 2-Port Fetoscopic Spina Bifida Closure Program.

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal closure of open spina bifida via open fetal surgery improves neurologic outcomes for infants in selected pregnancies. Fetoscopic techniques that are minimally invasive to the uterus aim to provide equivalent fetal benefits while minimizing maternal morbidities, but the optimal technique is undetermined. We describe the development, evolution, and feasibility of the laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic technique for prenatal closure of fetal spina bifida in a newly established program. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women consented for laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic closure of isolated fetal spina bifida. Inclusion and exclusion criteria followed the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Team preparation involved observation at the originating center, protocol development, ancillary staff training, and surgical rehearsal using patient-matched models through simulation prior to program implementation. The primary outcome was the ability to complete the repair fetoscopically. Secondary maternal and fetal outcomes to assess performance of the technique were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Of 57 women screened, 19 (33%) consented for laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopy between February 2017 and December 2019. Fetoscopic closure was completed in 84% (16/19) cases. Over time, the technique was modified from a single- to a multilayer closure. In utero hindbrain herniation improved in 86% (12/14) of undelivered patients at 6 weeks postoperatively. Spontaneous rupture of membranes occurred in 31% (5/16) of fetoscopic cases. For completed cases, median gestational age at birth was 37 (range 27-39.6) weeks and 50% (8/16) of women delivered at term. Vaginal birth was achieved in 56% (9/16) of patients. One newborn had a cerebrospinal fluid leak that required postnatal surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic spina bifida closure program through rigorous preparation and multispecialty team training may accelerate the learning curve and demonstrates favorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Experience of 300 cases of prenatal fetoscopic open spina bifida repair: report of the International Fetoscopic Neural Tube Defect Repair Consortium.

BACKGROUND: The multicenter randomized controlled trial Management of Myelomeningocele Study demonstrated that prenatal repair of open spina bifida by hysterotomy, compared with postnatal repair, decreases the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and increases the chances of independent ambulation. However, the hysterotomy approach is associated with risks that are inherent to the uterine incision. Fetal surgeons from around the world embarked on fetoscopic open spina bifida repair aiming to reduce maternal and fetal/neonatal risks while preserving the neurologic benefits of in utero surgery to the child. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the main obstetrical, perinatal, and neurosurgical outcomes in the first 12 months of life of children undergoing prenatal fetoscopic repair of open spina bifida included in an international registry and to compare these with the results reported in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study and in a subsequent large cohort of patients who received an open fetal surgery repair. STUDY DESIGN: All known centers performing fetoscopic spina bifida repair were contacted and invited to participate in a Fetoscopic Myelomeningocele Repair Consortium and enroll their patients in a registry. Patient data entered into this fetoscopic registry were analyzed for this report. Fisher exact test was performed for comparison of categorical variables in the registry with both the Management of Myelomeningocele Study and a post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the registry data for predictors of preterm birth at <30 weeks' gestation, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and need for postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the fetoscopic registry. RESULTS: There were 300 patients in the fetoscopic registry, 78 in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study, and 100 in the post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort. The 3 data sets showed similar anatomic levels of the spinal lesion, mean gestational age at delivery, distribution of motor function compared with upper anatomic level of the lesion in the neonates, and perinatal death. In the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (26.16±1.6 weeks) and post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort (23.3 [20.2-25.6] weeks), compared with the fetoscopic registry group (23.6±1.4 weeks), the gestational age at surgery was lower (comparing fetoscopic repair group with the Management of Myelomeningocele Study; P<.01). After open fetal surgery, all patients were delivered by cesarean delivery, whereas in the fetoscopic registry approximately one-third were delivered vaginally (P<.01). At cesarean delivery, areas of dehiscence or thinning in the scar were observed in 34% of cases in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study, in 49% in the post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort, and in 0% in the fetoscopic registry (P<.01 for both comparisons). At 12 months of age, there was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring treatment for hydrocephalus between those in the fetoscopic registry and the Management of Myelomeningocele Study. CONCLUSION: Prenatal and postnatal outcomes up to 12 months of age after prenatal fetoscopic and open fetal surgery repair of open spina bifida are similar. Fetoscopic repair allows for having a vaginal delivery and eliminates the risk of uterine scar dehiscence, therefore protecting subsequent pregnancies of unnecessary maternal and fetal risks.

Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?

Since the completion of the Management of Myelomeningocoele Study, maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida has become a valid option for expecting parents. More recently, multiple groups are exploring a minimally invasive approach and recent outcomes have addressed many of the initial concerns with this approach. Based on a previously published framework, we attempt to delineate the developmental stage of the surgical techniques. Furthermore, we discuss the barriers of performing randomized controlled trials comparing two surgical interventions and suggest that data collection through registries is an alternative method to gather high-grade evidence.

FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as the failure of the fetus to meet its growth potential due to a pathological factor, most commonly placental dysfunction. Worldwide, FGR is a leading cause of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and short- and long-term morbidity. Ongoing advances in clinical care, especially in definitions, diagnosis, and management of FGR, require efforts to effectively translate these changes to the wide range of obstetric care providers. This article highlights agreements based on current research in the diagnosis and management of FGR, and the areas that need more research to provide further clarification of recommendations. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence along with practical recommendations concerning the care of pregnancies at risk of or complicated by FGR, with the overall goal to decrease the risk of stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with this condition. To achieve these goals, FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) brought together international experts to review and summarize current knowledge of FGR. This summary is directed at multiple stakeholders, including healthcare providers, healthcare delivery organizations and providers, FIGO member societies, and professional organizations. Recognizing the variation in the resources and expertise available for the management of FGR in different countries or regions, this article attempts to take into consideration the unique aspects of antenatal care in low-resource settings (labelled "LRS" in the recommendations). This was achieved by collaboration with authors and FIGO member societies from low-resource settings such as India, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.

Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Early identification of women at risk is needed to plan management. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of existing pre-eclampsia prediction models and to develop and validate models for pre-eclampsia using individual participant data meta-analysis. We also estimated the prognostic value of individual markers. DESIGN: This was an individual participant data meta-analysis of cohort studies. SETTING: Source data from secondary and tertiary care. PREDICTORS: We identified predictors from systematic reviews, and prioritised for importance in an international survey. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Early-onset (delivery at < 34 weeks' gestation), late-onset (delivery at ≥ 34 weeks' gestation) and any-onset pre-eclampsia. ANALYSIS: We externally validated existing prediction models in UK cohorts and reported their performance in terms of discrimination and calibration. We developed and validated 12 new models based on clinical characteristics, clinical characteristics and biochemical markers, and clinical characteristics and ultrasound markers in the first and second trimesters. We summarised the data set-specific performance of each model using a random-effects meta-analysis. Discrimination was considered promising for C-statistics of ≥ 0.7, and calibration was considered good if the slope was near 1 and calibration-in-the-large was near 0. Heterogeneity was quantified using I2 and τ2. A decision curve analysis was undertaken to determine the clinical utility (net benefit) of the models. We reported the unadjusted prognostic value of individual predictors for pre-eclampsia as odds ratios with 95% confidence and prediction intervals. RESULTS: The International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications network comprised 78 studies (3,570,993 singleton pregnancies) identified from systematic reviews of tests to predict pre-eclampsia. Twenty-four of the 131 published prediction models could be validated in 11 UK cohorts. Summary C-statistics were between 0.6 and 0.7 for most models, and calibration was generally poor owing to large between-study heterogeneity, suggesting model overfitting. The clinical utility of the models varied between showing net harm to showing minimal or no net benefit. The average discrimination for IPPIC models ranged between 0.68 and 0.83. This was highest for the second-trimester clinical characteristics and biochemical markers model to predict early-onset pre-eclampsia, and lowest for the first-trimester clinical characteristics models to predict any pre-eclampsia. Calibration performance was heterogeneous across studies. Net benefit was observed for International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications first and second-trimester clinical characteristics and clinical characteristics and biochemical markers models predicting any pre-eclampsia, when validated in singleton nulliparous women managed in the UK NHS. History of hypertension, parity, smoking, mode of conception, placental growth factor and uterine artery pulsatility index had the strongest unadjusted associations with pre-eclampsia. LIMITATIONS: Variations in study population characteristics, type of predictors reported, too few events in some validation cohorts and the type of measurements contributed to heterogeneity in performance of the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications models. Some published models were not validated because model predictors were unavailable in the individual participant data. CONCLUSION: For models that could be validated, predictive performance was generally poor across data sets. Although the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications models show good predictive performance on average, and in the singleton nulliparous population, heterogeneity in calibration performance is likely across settings. FUTURE WORK: Recalibration of model parameters within populations may improve calibration performance. Additional strong predictors need to be identified to improve model performance and consistency. Validation, including examination of calibration heterogeneity, is required for the models we could not validate. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015029349. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 72. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?: Pre-eclampsia, a condition in pregnancy that results in raised blood pressure and protein in the urine, is a major cause of complications for the mother and baby. WHAT IS NEEDED?: A way of accurately identifying women at high risk of pre-eclampsia to allow clinicians to start preventative interventions such as administering aspirin or frequently monitoring women during pregnancy. WHERE ARE THE RESEARCH GAPS?: Although over 100 tools (models) have been reported worldwide to predict pre-eclampsia, to date their performance in women managed in the UK NHS is unknown. WHAT DID WE PLAN TO DO?: We planned to comprehensively identify all published models that predict the risk of pre-eclampsia occurring at any time during pregnancy and to assess if this prediction is accurate in the UK population. If the existing models did not perform satisfactorily, we aimed to develop new prediction models. WHAT DID WE FIND?: We formed the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications network, which provided data from a large number of studies (78 studies, 25 countries, 125 researchers, 3,570,993 singleton pregnancies). We were able to assess the performance of 24 out of the 131 models published to predict pre-eclampsia in 11 UK data sets. The models did not accurately predict the risk of pre-eclampsia across all UK data sets, and their performance varied within individual data sets. We developed new prediction models that showed promising performance on average across all data sets, but their ability to correctly identify women who develop pre-eclampsia varied between populations. The models were more clinically useful when used in the care of first-time mothers pregnant with one child, compared to a strategy of treating them all as if they were at high-risk of pre-eclampsia. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?: Before using the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications models in various populations, they need to be adjusted for characteristics of the particular population and the setting of application.

Maternal azithromycin therapy for Ureaplasma parvum intraamniotic infection improves fetal hemodynamics in a nonhuman primate model.

BACKGROUND: Ureaplasma parvum infection is a prevalent cause of intrauterine infection associated with preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, fetal inflammatory response syndrome, and adverse postnatal sequelae. Elucidation of diagnostic and treatment strategies for infection-associated preterm labor may improve perinatal and long-term outcomes for these cases. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effect of intraamniotic Ureaplasma infection on fetal hemodynamic and cardiac function and the effect of maternal antibiotic treatment on these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Chronically catheterized pregnant rhesus monkeys were assigned to control (n=6), intraamniotic inoculation with Ureaplasma parvum (107 colony-forming units/mL, n=15), and intraamniotic infection plus azithromycin treatment (12.5 mg/kg twice a day intravenously, n=8) groups. At approximately 135 days' gestation (term=165 days), pulsed and color Doppler ultrasonography was used to obtain measurements of fetal hemodynamics (pulsatility index of umbilical artery, ductus venosus, descending aorta, ductus arteriosus, aortic isthmus, right pulmonary artery, middle cerebral artery and cerebroplacental ratio, and left and right ventricular cardiac outputs) and cardiac function (ratio of peak early vs late transmitral flow velocity [marker of ventricular function], Tei index [myocardial performance index]). These indices were stratified by amniotic fluid proinflammatory mediator levels and cardiac histology. RESULTS: Umbilical and fetal pulmonary artery vascular impedances were significantly increased in animals from the intraamniotic inoculation with Ureaplasma parvum group (P<.05). Azithromycin treatment restored values to control levels. Amniotic fluid prostaglandin F2 alpha levels were significantly higher in animals with abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index (>1.1) than in those with normal blood flow (P<.05; Spearman ρ=0.6, P<.05). In the intraamniotic inoculation with Ureaplasma parvum group, left ventricular cardiac output was significantly decreased (P<.001), and more animals had abnormal right-to-left ventricular cardiac output ratios (defined as >1.6, P<.05). Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentrations were elevated in cases of abnormal right-to-left ventricular cardiac output ratios compared with those in normal cases (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Fetal hemodynamic alterations were associated with intraamniotic Ureaplasma infection and ameliorated after maternal antibiotic treatment. Doppler ultrasonographic measurements merit continuing investigation as a diagnostic method to identify fetal cardiovascular and hemodynamic compromise associated with intrauterine infection or inflammation and in the evaluation of therapeutic interventions or clinical management of preterm labor.